What This Document Is
This is a detailed assignment guideline and scoring rubric for a research project within EDUC 275: Integrating Technology to Support Teaching and Learning at Winthrop University. The project centers around a deep exploration of “Core Commitments” – fundamental principles relating to social and personal responsibility – and how these commitments can be understood and supported through effective technology integration in educational settings. It outlines expectations for a multi-faceted presentation of research findings.
Why This Document Matters
This resource is essential for students enrolled in EDUC 275 who are tasked with completing the Core Commitments Research Project. It’s particularly valuable *before* beginning research and project development, as it clarifies the criteria for successful completion and the weighting of different project components. Educators may also find it useful as a model for designing similar assignments focused on ethical considerations in technology and education. Understanding these guidelines will help you focus your efforts and maximize your potential score.
Common Limitations or Challenges
This document provides a comprehensive framework for the assignment, including detailed scoring criteria. However, it does *not* offer specific examples of exemplary projects, nor does it provide pre-selected commitments for students to investigate. It also doesn’t include detailed instructions on *how* to conduct research or create the required media components – those skills are assumed to be developed through other course materials. It focuses on expectations, not execution.
What This Document Provides
* A clear breakdown of the project’s core components and their relative weight in the final grade.
* Detailed descriptions of performance expectations at different scoring levels (ranging from excellent to needs improvement).
* Specific criteria for evaluating the thoroughness of research findings related to student, teacher, and citizen life.
* Guidelines for incorporating technology and various media formats into the presentation.
* Expectations for source credibility and proper citation using APA standards.
* Rubric details for evaluating webpage design elements (title, navigation, etc.).
* Information regarding the expected length and content of the group presentation.
