What This Document Is
This resource is a focused exploration of a key theoretical framework within the field of Communication – Dramatism. Developed by Kenneth Burke, Dramatism offers a unique perspective on understanding human motivation and rhetorical action. It moves beyond simply *what* is said, to *why* it is said, framing communication as a form of action rooted in fundamental human drives. This isn’t a historical overview of dramatic arts, but a deep dive into a method for analyzing the underlying motivations within communication events.
Why This Document Matters
Students enrolled in Communication Theory (COM 219) at West Chester University, and anyone interested in rhetorical analysis, will find this particularly valuable. It’s ideal for those seeking to strengthen their analytical skills and move beyond surface-level interpretations of messages. This exploration is beneficial when tackling complex persuasive speeches, media texts, or even everyday interactions – providing a lens to dissect the motivations at play. It’s especially helpful when preparing for in-depth discussions and critical analyses of communication phenomena.
Common Limitations or Challenges
This resource focuses specifically on Burke’s theory of Dramatism. It does not provide a comprehensive overview of all communication theories covered in COM 219. While it explains the core concepts, it doesn’t offer pre-packaged analyses of specific communication events – you’ll need to apply the framework yourself. It also assumes a basic understanding of rhetorical principles; it’s not an introductory course to communication studies as a whole.
What This Document Provides
* A detailed explanation of Burke’s central concept: Dramatism as a method of analysis.
* An introduction to the Dramatistic Pentad – the five key elements used to interpret verbal action.
* Exploration of concepts like “God terms” and “Devil terms” and their role in rhetorical strategies.
* Discussion of the relationship between language, guilt, and the search for redemption.
* Insights into the crucial role of “identification” in the process of persuasion.
* Examination of how different emphases within the Pentad reveal underlying worldviews.
