This document outlines the requirements for a team-based critique of a peer-reviewed journal article within the context of Grand Canyon University’s English Composition I (ENG 105) course. It is designed for students enrolled in science-related majors (e.g., Physical Therapy, Forensic Science).
This assignment is crucial for developing critical reading and analytical skills essential for success in higher education and professional fields. Students will practice evaluating scholarly research, identifying biases, and assessing the validity of claims – skills needed to stay current in their disciplines. It’s used as a graded component of the course, requiring a team presentation.
This document does *not* provide a completed article critique, nor does it offer instruction on *how* to perform a detailed analysis. It also doesn’t include example critiques. Users will still need to locate, read, and analyze a journal article independently.
This document provides: directions for finding peer-reviewed articles using the GCU library, a list of considerations when critically reading an article (author credentials, clarity, biases, references), and a breakdown of the required components for the team presentation – including author background, article summary, and analysis of the article’s points and findings. It also specifies presentation length (3-10 minutes) and individual speaking requirements.