What This Document Is
This is a student paper for Oregon State University’s WR 121 English Composition course. It focuses on integrating research—specifically, an analysis of William Nordhaus’s article “Why the Global Warming Skeptics Are Wrong”—into a larger composition about global warming. The paper explores the arguments presented by Nordhaus and connects them to broader discussions surrounding climate change, including political and economic implications.
Why This Document Matters
This assignment is intended for students enrolled in WR 121 who are learning to synthesize source material and develop well-supported arguments. It serves as a demonstration of research integration skills, showing how to introduce, contextualize, and analyze a source text within a larger discussion. It’s likely used as a graded component of the course, assessing a student’s ability to engage with academic sources.
Common Limitations or Challenges
This document represents a single student’s approach to research integration. It is not a model essay or a comprehensive overview of global warming. It focuses specifically on one source and its connection to related arguments.
What This Document Provides
The paper includes a summary of Nordhaus’s main arguments, a discussion of the context surrounding the debate on global warming, and connections to other sources like articles from *Time* magazine and *Scientific American*. It also touches on the EPA’s stance on CO2 and the National Science Foundation’s grant process. This preview does *not* include the full analysis of Nordhaus’s article, the complete connections to other sources, or the concluding arguments of the student paper.
