What This Document Is
This resource is a focused set of worksheets designed to reinforce core principles from Intro to Logic I (PHIL 110) at the University of South Carolina. Specifically, these worksheets center around the application of conditional and related argument forms. It’s built to help students move beyond simply *knowing* the rules of inference and begin *applying* them to analyze argument structures. The material appears to be geared towards practical exercises, likely involving identifying valid and invalid arguments.
Why This Document Matters
Students enrolled in PHIL 110, particularly those finding the abstract nature of logical proofs challenging, will find this a valuable study aid. It’s best used *after* initial lectures and readings on conditional statements, modus ponens, modus tollens, and related rules. This resource is ideal for solidifying understanding through repeated practice and can be particularly helpful when preparing for quizzes or exams that require argument analysis. It’s designed to build confidence in recognizing and evaluating logical forms.
Common Limitations or Challenges
This set of worksheets focuses specifically on conditional argument forms and does not cover all areas of introductory logic. It won’t provide a comprehensive review of propositional logic, truth tables, or predicate logic. Furthermore, while the worksheets likely offer opportunities for practice, they do not substitute for a thorough understanding of the underlying concepts as presented in course lectures and the assigned textbook. It’s a practice tool, not a replacement for core learning materials.
What This Document Provides
* A focused practice set on conditional rules of inference.
* Templates relating to conditional proof strategies.
* Opportunities to assess argument validity.
* A framework for constructing verbal justifications or counterexamples.
* Exercises relating to strengthening the consequent and constructive dilemmas.
