What This Document Is
This is a detailed assignment guideline for a political science paper at the University of Southern California. Specifically, it outlines the requirements for a twelve-page research paper focused on the impact of a U.S. Supreme Court case *or* the operational effects of a federal administrative agency’s policy implementation. The assignment is for PS130g, a course exploring Law, Politics and Public Policy, and is a significant component of the final grade. It details expectations for in-depth analysis and critical thinking regarding complex legal and political issues.
Why This Document Matters
Students enrolled in advanced political science courses, particularly those focusing on constitutional law, public policy, or judicial behavior, will find this assignment incredibly valuable. It’s essential reading *before* beginning work on the paper, as it clarifies expectations regarding scope, length, and analytical approach. Those preparing for similar coursework at other institutions can also benefit from understanding the rigorous standards expected for upper-level undergraduate legal and policy analysis. This is particularly useful during the research and outlining phases of a similar project.
Common Limitations or Challenges
This document provides the *framework* for the assignment, including a list of potential Supreme Court cases to analyze. However, it does *not* offer any pre-written analysis, arguments, or interpretations of those cases or agency actions. It also doesn’t include specific research resources beyond mentioning Ares. Students will need to conduct independent research and formulate their own arguments based on the provided guidelines. It does not provide examples of successful papers.
What This Document Provides
* A clear outline of the paper’s length and formatting requirements.
* A choice between focusing on a Supreme Court case or a federal administrative agency.
* A list of potential Supreme Court cases for analysis (Rodriguez v. U.S., Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, Shelby County v. Holder, U.S. v. Stevens, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, District of Columbia v. Heller, Miller v. Alabama, and McCullen v. Coakley).
* Detailed instructions on the type of analysis expected – including identifying moral, political, and economic assumptions within legal reasoning.
* Specific guidance on summarizing case arguments and focusing on policy implications.
* The due date and submission location for the completed assignment.
